Skip to main content

Right-Wing Leaders Declare All Political Violence Comes From the Left, Ignore Elephant in Room

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, conservative commentators have reached a bold conclusion: all political violence is the exclusive property of the left. “They own it, trademark pending,” one pundit announced, as if political violence were a line of energy drinks.

Selective Memory Loss: A New Patriot’s Disease

According to this narrative, the January 6th attack was just a “rowdy Capitol tour,” the Oklahoma City bombing was an “overzealous urban renewal project,” and that guy who mailed pipe bombs to journalists was really just an ambitious Etsy entrepreneur.

Meanwhile, if someone wearing skinny jeans throws a can of LaCroix in the general direction of a police cruiser, that becomes Exhibit A in the great liberal conspiracy of violence.

Violence Math: Carry the Zero

When asked about statistics showing that far-right extremists are responsible for the majority of domestic terrorism in the United States, Kirk’s supporters explained that math is also a liberal plot. “Numbers are woke,” one said. “Ever notice how two plus two never equals MAGA? Exactly.”

Another added: “Besides, if you don’t count arsons, assaults, shootings, stabbings, bombings, kidnappings, and attempted coups, then clearly the left is more violent.”

The Upside-Down Compass

To justify this claim, right-wing media have begun spinning morality like a bingo wheel. “If the left does it, it’s violence. If we do it, it’s patriotism. If we get caught, it’s Antifa in disguise. And if none of that sticks, it was just a peaceful barbecue.”

Conclusion

So as the right continues its moral gymnastics routine, remember: the majority of political violence may come from far-right actors, but acknowledging that fact is apparently too violent for them to handle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump Says Ukraine War Caused by Stolen 2020 Election; Ends Conflict Instantly with Confidence

At a joint press conference this week with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy , U.S. President Donald Trump unveiled a sweeping new theory of international relations, asserting that the Russian invasion of Ukraine would never have occurred if the 2020 U.S. presidential election had not been “stolen from him personally.” “This war,” Trump said, gesturing broadly toward Eastern Europe, “is really about me. Everybody knows it. If I were president, this would not have happened. Putin would have been too scared. Tremendously scared.” Standing beside him, Zelensky maintained a diplomatic expression usually reserved for situations involving translation errors or mild food poisoning. Trump continued, explaining that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was not the result of decades of post-Cold War tension, NATO expansion debates, or Russian imperial ambition, but rather a direct consequence of Trump not being in the White House at the time. “Putin respects strength,” Trump said. “And by streng...

Trump’s Prime-Time Address Assures Americans the Economy Is Perfect—Suggests They’re Just Too Stupid to Notice

In an unexpected return to prime-time television, President Donald J. Trump delivered a 28-minute national address Wednesday night designed, according to his staff, to “clear up confusion about the economy.” The resulting speech instead raised questions about whether he had accidentally wandered onto the soundstage during a pharmaceutical infomercial. “Ladies and gentlemen, the American economy is the strongest, the bigliest, the most incredible it has ever been,” Trump announced, gripping the lectern as if it had personally wronged him. “If you can’t see that, well… maybe you’re just not very smart. Not everyone can be smart. I’m very smart. But most of you, frankly? Not so much.” Economic experts, who had spent the previous week offering cautious optimism mixed with concern about rising costs, were surprised to learn that the entire issue was simply a matter of insufficient national intelligence. “Normally we talk about inflation, interest rates, employment trends,” said economist Da...

Trump Unveils Bold New Healthcare Vision: Trumpcare, Which Is Totally Different From Obamacare Except for the Parts That Are the Same

In a dazzling Rose Garden announcement complete with golden bunting, a fog machine, and a choir humming “Hail to the Chief” in a minor key, President Donald J. Trump unveiled what he called “the most spectacular, most terrific, most everybody-is-saying-so healthcare plan in American history.” He dubbed it Trumpcare™ —a revolutionary system in which the federal government will give money directly to people so that they can better afford their own healthcare. “Folks, it’s simple,” Trump proclaimed, flanked by several cardboard cutouts of himself in a lab coat. “Under Trumpcare, instead of the government being involved—terrible idea, horrible—we’re going to give people money so they can pay for their healthcare. Total freedom. The best freedom.” The audience applauded, though several appeared to be staffers who had been instructed to clap every time Trump paused to breathe. A Reporter Dares to Ask During the Q&A portion—limited to 30 seconds and only reporters who had pre-approved ...