WASHINGTON, D.C. — After six Democratic members of Congress released a video reminding U.S. military personnel that they should not follow illegal orders, the Trump administration denounced the act as “seditious,” “traitorous,” and “un-American,” prompting the nation to collectively tilt its head and ask, Wait… does that mean you were planning to give illegal orders?
White House spokespeople immediately clarified that no, the administration wasn’t admitting to anything
but yes, anyone warning soldiers about illegal commands should “keep their mouths shut if they know what’s good for them.”
“You see, telling troops to obey the law undermines the President’s authority,” said Press Secretary Chad “Don’t Think Too Hard About It” Mitchell. “Which, now that you mention it, may raise some questions about what kind of orders we’re talking about, but we’d prefer you didn’t.”
New Legal Theory: Obedience Is Patriotic, Legality Is Optional
Administration lawyers have reportedly developed a cutting-edge constitutional doctrine known as “Because I Said So.” Under this principle, any order given by the President automatically becomes legal through the sheer power of confidence and repetition.
“Of course we’d never issue an illegal order,” said acting Attorney General Rickey Hammers. “But if we did, and you refused, that’d be treason. Which makes it legal again. That’s the beauty of circular logic—it’s unbreakable.”
Democrats Guilty of Crime: Quoting the Constitution
The six lawmakers—each with military or intelligence backgrounds—committed the unforgivable sin of reminding service members that their oath is to the Constitution, not to any one person. The White House called this “an outrageous attack on the President’s feelings.”
“When they say ‘unlawful orders,’ they’re really saying we might do something unlawful,” said Trump. “And that’s fake news. Totally fake. The best orders. The most legal orders. Everyone says so.”
Reporters then asked which specific orders the Democrats were supposedly undermining, prompting Trump to shout, “You’ll find out!” before leaving the room to tweet in all caps about “traitors” and “total loyalty.”
Historians: “This Is What Happens When You Fail Civics.”
Political scientists confirmed that warning the military not to break the law cannot, by definition, be sedition—
unless the administration plans to make breaking the law mandatory, in which case, congratulations, you’ve just defined tyranny.
Dr. Karen Wexler of Georgetown put it bluntly:
“If your government insists that telling soldiers to obey the law is treason, then the problem isn’t the soldiers, or the lawmakers. The problem is that the government is quietly admitting it wants to commit crimes.”
She then excused herself to update her “Democracy Survival Bingo Card,” which now includes “Administration accidentally confesses intentions through projection.”
Trump Administration Reassures Public: “We’re Totally Not Planning Anything Illegal.”
In a late-night social media post, the President attempted to calm the situation:
“NO ILLEGAL ORDERS! NONE! BUT IF I DID GIVE ONE, IT WOULD BE THE BEST ILLEGAL ORDER EVER. EVERYONE WOULD FOLLOW IT. LEGALLY.”
Minutes later, aides reportedly unplugged the Wi-Fi at Mar-a-Lago “for national security reasons.”
Final Thoughts
If reminding soldiers to obey lawful orders is sedition, then the only logical conclusion is that someone up top is counting on unlawful ones being followed.
And if the administration is outraged at the idea of the military upholding the Constitution…
maybe it’s time to ask who’s really committing the sedition.
Comments
Post a Comment