Skip to main content

FBI Raid on John Bolton’s House Definitely Not Weaponization of the Judiciary, Officials Assure Us

In a shocking turn of events that absolutely has nothing to do with politics, the FBI recently searched the home of former National Security Advisor and mustache aficionado John Bolton. According to officials, the search was “totally normal,” “by the book,” and in no way connected to the fact that Bolton is a Trump critic whose best-selling hobby is telling anyone with a microphone that the former president is unfit for office.

“This isn’t weaponization,” insisted one Justice Department spokesperson, polishing a battering ram. “We’d raid anyone’s home if they had the audacity to publish a tell-all book that embarrassed a sitting president. That’s just standard operating procedure.”

Critics suggested the raid was suspiciously timed, but the FBI clarified that it was merely coincidence. “Our schedule was open this week between searching Melania’s shoe closet and monitoring PTA meetings for terrorist activity,” explained an agent, noting that “Bolton’s house was on the way to Chick-fil-A.”

When asked what they were looking for, the FBI would not confirm whether it was classified documents, state secrets, or simply Bolton’s secret recipe for microwave Salisbury steak. “Can’t comment on an ongoing investigation,” one official said, while loading cartons of mustache wax into evidence bags.

Bolton himself remained calm, noting that as a lifelong Republican hawk, he was accustomed to surprise operations. “I once advocated bombing three countries before breakfast,” he said. “Frankly, I’m impressed the FBI showed such restraint by only raiding my kitchen.”

Meanwhile, defenders of the raid stressed that Americans should not see this as an attempt to intimidate critics of Trump. “Weaponization of the judiciary? Please,” scoffed one political analyst. “If the DOJ wanted to weaponize the system, they’d just subpoena his barber.”

At press time, Bolton’s mustache had reportedly filed its own lawsuit, citing “wrongful seizure and excessive grooming.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump Says Ukraine War Caused by Stolen 2020 Election; Ends Conflict Instantly with Confidence

At a joint press conference this week with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy , U.S. President Donald Trump unveiled a sweeping new theory of international relations, asserting that the Russian invasion of Ukraine would never have occurred if the 2020 U.S. presidential election had not been “stolen from him personally.” “This war,” Trump said, gesturing broadly toward Eastern Europe, “is really about me. Everybody knows it. If I were president, this would not have happened. Putin would have been too scared. Tremendously scared.” Standing beside him, Zelensky maintained a diplomatic expression usually reserved for situations involving translation errors or mild food poisoning. Trump continued, explaining that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was not the result of decades of post-Cold War tension, NATO expansion debates, or Russian imperial ambition, but rather a direct consequence of Trump not being in the White House at the time. “Putin respects strength,” Trump said. “And by streng...

Trump’s Prime-Time Address Assures Americans the Economy Is Perfect—Suggests They’re Just Too Stupid to Notice

In an unexpected return to prime-time television, President Donald J. Trump delivered a 28-minute national address Wednesday night designed, according to his staff, to “clear up confusion about the economy.” The resulting speech instead raised questions about whether he had accidentally wandered onto the soundstage during a pharmaceutical infomercial. “Ladies and gentlemen, the American economy is the strongest, the bigliest, the most incredible it has ever been,” Trump announced, gripping the lectern as if it had personally wronged him. “If you can’t see that, well… maybe you’re just not very smart. Not everyone can be smart. I’m very smart. But most of you, frankly? Not so much.” Economic experts, who had spent the previous week offering cautious optimism mixed with concern about rising costs, were surprised to learn that the entire issue was simply a matter of insufficient national intelligence. “Normally we talk about inflation, interest rates, employment trends,” said economist Da...

Nation Excited to Experience All the Thrill of Getting a Passport — Every Two Years — Just to Vote

WASHINGTON — In a stunning development for lovers of paperwork everywhere, lawmakers have unveiled the SAFE Act, a bold new initiative promising to bring the full sensory experience of passport acquisition directly to your local election cycle. Supporters say the bill will ensure “secure, confident elections,” while critics have pointed out it also ensures that Americans can relive the magic of government-issued identity documentation roughly as often as they replace their toothbrush. Democracy, Now With Waiting Rooms Under the proposal, voters would present newly verified identification documentation — potentially requiring updated proof of citizenship — before casting a ballot. “People love passports,” said one enthusiastic policy backer. “The lines. The forms. The gentle existential dread while wondering if your birth certificate has the right font. Why should international travel have all the fun?” Experts estimate the average American could now enjoy: Searching for their origina...