Letter from a Reader:
Dear Aunt Liberty,
I am the first president in 150 years not to have a dog. My advisors tell me the voters would like me more — very bigly, the biggest like ever — if I had one. The problem is that in the past I have liked dogs, especially the young ones, a little too much if you know what I mean. I don’t want to get caught with my pants down. One of those nasty journalists might start calling me a pup-a-phile. What should I do?
— Dogless in D.C.
Aunt Liberty Responds:
Dear Dogless,
First, congratulations on maintaining a canine-free presidency — a feat not seen since Andrew Johnson, who also lacked a dog and, coincidentally, an impeachment acquittal worth bragging about.
Now, to your concern. I understand you want a furry friend to boost your approval ratings. Dogs are loyal, affectionate, and often more coherent in press conferences than their owners. However, your… let’s call it “history of over-enthusiasm” raises a few red flags, not unlike the ones waved at your rallies.
Here’s my advice:
-
Consider a goldfish. Voters can’t resist a pet, and a goldfish won’t end up testifying before Congress. The only scandal you’ll face is overfeeding.
-
Try a stuffed animal. A plush golden retriever staged strategically in photo-ops will melt hearts without requiring walks, kibble, or FBI investigations. Bonus: it won’t leak to the press.
-
Outsource the dog. Borrow one from a supporter for campaign stops. Nothing says “man of the people” like petting someone else’s pooch before hopping back on the jet.
-
Lean into your brand. If journalists start calling you a “pup-a-phile,” simply rebrand it. Sell red hats with the slogan: Paws America Great Again. Your base will eat it up, even if the dog doesn’t.
In short: yes, a dog could humanize you. But unless you can resist turning “fetch” into a federal investigation, I’d stick with the fish. Remember: the only thing worse than being caught dogless is being caught dog-full.
Sincerely,
Aunt Liberty
Comments
Post a Comment